David Brooks Almost Fooled Me: I usually can't abide David Brooks's columns, but on the train home tonight, I got around to reading yesterday's column. I was thinking "Wow! This is one of the best columns of his I've ever read! I haven't gotten pissed off at his stupidity even once!"
Right up until the last paragraph:
Until these and other issues are addressed, the global markets will lack confidence in asset values. Bankers will cower, afraid to lend. America?s role as the global hub will be threatened. Europeans will drift toward nationalization. Neomercantilists will fill the vacuum.
This is the test. This is the problem that will consume the next president. Meanwhile, the two candidates for that office are talking about Bill Ayers and Charles Keating.
Indeed, he had me with him right up through his last sentence, and then he has to go and ruin it. The fact is, comparing Bill Ayres and Charles Keating as Brooks does is a false equivalency. One is a casual acquaintance of the candidate, while the other was the prime mover behind pushing the other candidate onto the national stage.
Worse still, if McCain weren't talking about Ayers, Obama wouldn't need to be pointing out McCain's association with Keating as a way of showing how hypocritcal and dishonest McCain is.
This is what happens all the time among the elite punditocracy -- they can't seem to bring themselves to come out and state the obvious:
One candidate is a disaster, a dishonest and dishonorable man who has taken his campaign into the gutter. And that candidate is John McCain.
